Evaluation of the sport
Movement Analysis
Movement
analysis of the London Marathon outlines that it is a whole body activity,
involving continuous leg and arm movements (Baechle & Earle, 2008). Running
is a unidirectional activity however it may also be viewed as a rotational movement
in biomechanical terms. As described by Elphinston (2008), the pelvis and spine
continuously rotate and counter rotate during running in order to facilitate
forward propulsion. The primary
muscles involved in running are the quadriceps, hamstrings, gluteus
maximus, iliopsoas, gastrocnemius and soleus.
The postural, arm and shoulder muscles are also involved (Baechle & Earke,
2008). For
successful performance in the marathon, good cardiovascular endurance is needed
(Costill, 1972). Having good core stability is beneficial as it improves running
performance (Sato & Mokha, 2009).
Physiological Analysis
The main
physiological requirement of the sport is cardiovascular endurance therefore
the aerobic system is primarily used (Costill, Branam, Eddy & Sparks, 1971).
There is no recovery time during a marathon as it is a continuous activity.
Injury Analysis
The knee is
the predominant site of injury for long-distance runners (van Gent, Siem, van
Middelkoop, van Os, Bierma-Zeinstra & Koes, 2007). First time participation
in a marathon is associated with increased risk of injury (Satterthwaite,
Norton, Larmer & Robinson, 1999). The London Marathon is run on concrete,
typically with running shoes. For female runners, having running shoes older
than 4-6 months is a risk factor for lower extremity injuries (van Gent et al.,
2007). Evaluation of the athlete
Movement Assessment
The
female runner completed a musculoskeletal screen to establish current
strengths and weaknesses regarding mobility and stability (Winter,
Bromley, Davison, Jones & Mercer, 2007; Cook, Burton &
Hoogenboom, 2006). This established the runner’s training status
supporting the basis for an exercise programme (Winter et al., 2007).
The Exercises for the Movement Assessment
A
deep squat performance test resulted in a poor squat performance (Cook
et al., 2006). A multiple repetition test was conducted to measure
baseline muscular endurance (Baechle and Earle, 2008; Winter et al.,
2007). Such testing produced poor strength results and the runner had no
experience using free-weights. The runner’s core stability test results
were poor and this was analysed through a trunk stability test (Sato
& Mokha, 2009). Gait analysis results showed the runner ran on her
toes proving poor running mechanics (Lee & Grimson, 2002). Bilateral
gluteus medius weakness was concluded from a hurdle step test (Cook, et
al., 2006).
Training Status
According to Baechle and Earle (2008) the runner’s classification of
training status is beginner therefore the suitable resistance training
status is also beginner. Such characteristics which the runner possesses
enabling the classification to be determined include: not currently
training, training age of < 2 months, ≤ 1-2 training sessions a week,
training stress and training experience classified as none. The current season is off-season/pre-season.
Primary and Secondary Resistance Training Goal
Muscular endurance and core stability.
No comments:
Post a Comment